Legal Opinion

Earley v. Baughman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 3, 1948No. 33743PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the defendants, Edward Earley et al., from a judgment enforcing a restrictive covenant against the sale of real property to members of the Negro race. The defendants in error have filed here*650in a confession of error, citing in support thereof Shelley v. Kraemer, 92 L. Ed. 845, which case was decided after the rendition of the judgment appealed from. The confession of error is reasonably sustained by the record, and the judgment should be reversed. Public Service Co. v. City of Vinita, 192 Okla. 291, 135 P. 2d 57.

Reversed, with directions to dismiss the cause.

HURST, C. J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Public Service Co. of Okla. v. VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Tulsa v. CarrCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API