Legal Opinion

Borough of Cheswick v. Stuart

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1928No. Appeal 1530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is an action of scire facias sur municipal claim for curbing, assessed according to the foot front rule, along a street in front of premises owned by defendants. In 1921 the State of Pennsylvania, the County, of Allegheny, the Borough of Che'swick and the Allegheny Valley Street Railway Company entered into a contract to improve and re-surface that portion of the Pittsburgh and Freeport road which lies within the corporate limits of the Borough of Cheswick and is called Pittsburgh Street. By the terms of said agreement, the Borough of Cheswick was required to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  2. City of McKeesport v. SolesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Parkin v. New Kensington BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Philadelphia v. WeaverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Canton Borough v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Phila. to Use v. BradySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. City of Johnstown v. HowarthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API