Karpis v. Bungalow Bar Corp. of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from so much of an order as denied appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of res judicata (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 4). Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The defense of res judicata has no possible application to the fourth cause of action pleaded, and the motion to dismiss on that ground, having been addressed to the complaint as a whole, was properly denied. (Cf. Andrews v. 98 Montague, 282 App. Div. 1066; Oshins v. Zimmerman, 284 App. Div. 989; Adamo v. P. G. Motor Frgt., 4 A D 2d 758.) Moreover, in our opinion,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Smith v. KirkpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Andrews v. 98 Montague, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Oshins v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954