Legal Opinion

Erhardt v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1984No. 4-882A239Published

1Opinion of the Court

463 N.E.2d 1121 (1984)

Ruth E. ERHARDT, Appellant (Defendant below),

v.

STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 4-882A239.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District.

May 29, 1984.

Rehearing Denied July 11, 1984.

Kenneth R. Scheibenberger, Lebamoff & Associates, Fort Wayne, for appellant.

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Joseph N. Stevenson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

MILLER, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Ruth E. Erhardt was convicted of public indecency, a class A misdemeanor, (IND. CODE 35-45-4-1).[1] She seeks reversal on appeal claiming:

1. the evidence was insufficient to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Schacht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API