Legal Opinion

Sanitary District v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20126. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant in error, Rutherford B. English, on March 12, 1929, made application to the Industrial Commission for an award against plaintiff in error, the Sanitary District of Chicago, for personal injuries. The arbitrator found that he was entitled to $14 per week for 267 weeks, $12 for one week, and a pension of $25 per month for life. The award was confirmed by the Industrial Commission and by the circuit court of Cook county, and the case comes to this court on a writ of error.

Several grounds of reversal are urged, but it will be necessary to consider only one of them, namely, whether or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Spring Valley Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Carson-Payson Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Powers Storage Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lehigh Stone Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Santiemmo v. Days Transfer, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. County of Cook v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Delille v. Holton-Seelye Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API