People v. Mol
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from superior court of Grand Rapids; Newnham, J. James Mol was convicted of accepting a bribe.
1DissentGrant, J.
In the year 1900 respondent was an alderman of the city of Grand Rapids. His prosecution arose out of the .notorious water boodle scheme, the design of which was to secure a contract with the city to supply it with water from Lake Michigan. The information charges that respondent—
“Did corruptly accept from, to wit, Lant K. Salsbury, a gift and gratuity, to wit, $300, under an agreement and with the understanding that the vote, .opinion, and judgment of him, the said James Mol, as such alderman, should be given in a particular manner and upon a particular side, to wit, in favor of said City of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Stewart v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- People v. SalsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. SorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.