Legal Opinion

Putman Realty & Auction, Inc. v. Bailes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A jury found that a mortgagee, who had accepted late payments from the original mortgagors, was not estopped to demand payments on time from the mortgagors' grantee, and was not estopped to foreclose under the terms of the mortgage. We affirm.

In 1971, Minnie Bailes conveyed to Annie Sue J. Smith certain real property and received back from Mrs. Smith and her husband, Robert Smith, a promissory note in the amount of $24,000, and a mortgage on the property to secure payment of the note.

Under the terms of the instruments, payments on the note were due on the first of every month; however, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Draughon v. General Fin. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. B.K.W. Enterprises v. Tractor Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Auto-Plaza, Inc. v. Central Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Taylor v. WatersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Sharpe v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Sharpe)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
  5. Nelson v. VickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API