Legal Opinion

In re Paisley

Ohio Public Utilities Commission

Decided May 24, 1960No. 27094Published

1Opinion of the Court

*578FINDING AND ORDER

The Commission coming now to consider the above entitled matter upon the Application for Rehearing filed by Petitioners herein; the testimony adduced at a public hearing in the matter on July 24, 1959; the written Report of Attorney-Examiner C. Howard Johnson, dated February 15, 1960; the brief filed by Petitioner James O. Paisley, dated August 26, 1959, in support of the position of Petitioners; and being otherwise fully advised in the premises and in compliance with §4909.03 R. C., hereby renders the following opinion:

RESUME OF THE RECORD:

The Commission hereby adopts as its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nicoma Park Telephone Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API