Grossman v. Broad Street Trust Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Alessandroni, J.,
Plaintiff’s complaint in assumpsit seeks the return of moneys which had been placed in a safe deposit box in defendant’s vault. The complaint alleges lack of due diligence to prevent unauthorized access to the box. After a responsive answer, the matter came on for trial. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, a compulsory nonsuit was entered. Hence this motion.
The undisputed facts giving plaintiff all the favorable inferences are: In 1944 plaintiff rented a sqfe deposit box in the vault of a bank which subsequently merged with defendant bank. When the box was leased plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farnham v. Camden & Amboy RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Moon v. First Nat. Bank of BensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Safe Deposit Co. v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Veihelmann v. Manufacturers Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Lancaster County National Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.