Legal Opinion

Rupert v. Rupert

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed, without costs.

Defendant husband appeals to this Court from the final judgment of Supreme Court to bring up for review a prior nonfinal Appellate Division order (245 AD2d 1139 [1997]), which held an antenuptial agreement and two other documents amending that agreement valid and enforceable as one integrated agreement and remitted the case to Supreme Court, indicating that “further proceedings before the court should include the *663identity and value of the property obtained by the parties after the marriage” (id., at 1142). Upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rupert v. RupertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gaglia v. NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Western New York Land Conservancy, Inc. v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. West-Herr Ford, Inc. v. Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Rupert v. RupertNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API