Legal Opinion
Pomeranz v. Pomeranz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 3, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Hortense Gabel, J.), entered April 15, 1983, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the exercise of discretion by Special Term, which limited disclosure to the six-year period prior to commencement of the action, while affording plaintiff leave, after completion of defendant’s deposition, to obtain further disclosure of reasonably identifiable documents. We have held in the past that “[t]he relevant CPLR provisions do not exempt matrimonial actions from compliance with appropriate procedures” (Mari v Strater, 91 AD2d 579, 580). We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rios v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- City of New York v. FriedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Billet v. BilletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Matos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Mari v. StraterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Giannicos v. Bellevue Hospital Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Galgano v. GalganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- MacKinnon v. MacKinnonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Estate of CavalloNew York Surrogate's Court · 2008
- McMahan v. McMahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984