Legal Opinion

Bohl v. Koster

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1946No. File No. 8818Published

1Opinion of the Court

RUDOLPH, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for the alleged conversion of a team of mules, and some other minor items of personal property. With, reference to the mules the answer of the defendant in part alleged that on November 23, 1943 plaintiff agreed to buy the mules and a harness from defendant for the agreed price of $130', that plaintiff paid to the defendant $50 in cash and delivered to the defendant as conditional payment two $40 checks which checks were presented for payment and payment refused; that plaintiff paid to the defendant one of the $40 checks in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlantic City Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Southwark Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Eggleston v. PlowmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Warren v. LincolnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gay v. SundquistSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bunde v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API