Legal Opinion

Boatright v. Fennell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1925No. 8 Div. 670PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill was for foreclosure. The administrator of the mortgagor filed answer and cross-bill seeking relief as to other lands not described in the bill, but embraced in the mortgage sought to be foreclosed. The prayer of the cross-bill was to set aside a deed to lands not embraced in the foreclosure prayed for by the bill, or to be allowed to redeem all the lands covered by the mortgage, and therefore those embraced in the deed sought to be set aside on the ground of fraud or undue influence.

The decree rendered dismissing complainant’s bill, among other things, said of the deed, the subject…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Gresham v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Goodlett v. HansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. McLeod v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Stover v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Odom v. HullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. A. M. Robinson Co. v. Anniston Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Decker v. DeckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Brown v. LoewenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. J.F.S. v. Mobile County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API