Organization for Preserving Constitution of Zion Lutheran Church v. Mason
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentWilliams, J.
(dissenting)—I dissent. Although the majority recognizes that the constitution prohibits a court from entangling itself in matters of church doctrine and practice, majority opinion, at 445, it nevertheless requires the trial court to pass judgment on Zion Lutheran Church's call of a pastor—essentially a spiritual endeavor. See Numbers 11:16-17, :24-25; Matthew 9:35-38, 28:18-20; John 20:19-23; Acts 6:2-7; 2 Corinthians 3:6; Ephesians 4:7-12; Hebrews 5:1-10. There is an element of divine guidance in the calling of a pastor; to hold otherwise would be to deny the spirituality of the church. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of ManilaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Simpson v. Wells Lamont Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Protestant Episc. Church, Diocese of NJ v. GravesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists of North Carolina v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Herzl Congregation v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.