Legal Opinion

Starsky v. Williams

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 26, 1972No. Civ. 70-309 PHXPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

MUECKE, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed this action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1981-1985, alleging that his termination as an assistant professor at Arizona State University violates his federal First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Plaintiff and defendants have both moved for summary judgment. Each has filed factual statements in accordance with our Court’s Local Rule 11(h) [see Appendix for text]. The statements show no genuine issue of material, specific fact.

Plaintiff’s basic attack is upon the decision of the Arizona Board of Regents, as shown in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morris J. Starsky v. Jack R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Rendell Noel Mabey, Jr. v. Ronald ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Socialist Workers Party v. Attorney General of United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Aumiller v. University of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  5. Cooper v. RossDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API