Anschincks v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Robertson. From the Criminal Court of Calvert.
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Associate Justice.
Under the repeated rulings of this court this case must be dismissed for want of a final judgment. The entry in the court below, by which it was no doubt supposed the final judgment in that case was pronounced, does not contain the essential requisites of a final j udgment, as laid down in the case of Mayfield v. The State, (40 Tex., 289,) and the cases there referred to.
The entry in this case, from wtiich we learn the action of the court, shows that appellant was adjudged to be guilty of the offense with which he is charged in the indictment, and that the verdict of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mayfield v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- Darnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
- Choate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
- Labbaite v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878
- McCorquodale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.