Legal Opinion

Crane v. Schloss

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 1, 1891Published

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by William M. Crane and others against Nathan J. Schloss and others. A judgment for defendant was affirmed by the general term of the city court, and plaintiff again appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Plaintiffs sued to recover the value of certain gas fixtures and supplies alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendants at their request, and the defendants resisted the claim upon the ground that the fixtures and supplies were delivered upon trial, and that they .were not to retain and pay for the same unless such fixtures and supplies proved satisfactory, which, it was claimed, they did not. Upon the trial of the action evidence was introduced for the plaintiffs tending to show that with the consent of the defendants their premises were supplied by plaintiffs with four…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McEteere v. LittleNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
  2. Cumber v. SchoenfeldNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API