Legal Opinion

GEICO General Insurance Co. v. Harvey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 2017No. 4D15-4724PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the insurer’s motion for directed verdict on the insured’s bad faith claim. We find that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to show the insurer acted in bad faith in failing to settle the claim of the decedent’s estate against the insured. The evidence, taken in a light most favorable to the insured as the nonmoving party, showed that the insurer unconditionally tendered the estate the policy limits nine days after the accident, the insurer notified the insured that the estate wanted a statement seventeen…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Auto Mutual Indemnity Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Berges v. Infinity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Campbell v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. Allstate Indem. Co. v. RuizSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Suzanne Harvey, etc. v. Geico General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. DAVIE PLAZA, LLC v. EMMANUEL IORDANOGLU, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. v. JAMES M. HARVEYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. HarveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. HarveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API