Legal Opinion

DeHaza v. 2639 Jerome Avenue Associates

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 21, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

*637OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered September 12, 1997 reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated.

Plaintiffs were assaulted in their Bronx apartment by two intruders, one of whom (Cabreja) was eventually apprehended and convicted of felony charges in connection with the incident. This action against the building owner was based on allegations, inter alia, that the security door to the building was inoperable. While properly recognizing that the extensive history of criminal activity in the building was sufficient to create a triable issue as to whether the incident was…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Rivera v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Arnold Herstand & Co. v. Gallery: Gertrude Stein, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Chianese v. MeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API