Legal Opinion

Di Pippo v. Meyer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1970No. 11102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShannon, P. J.

This is an appeal upon questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

In her amended petition, plaintiff-appellant alleges that she purchased a house and lot from defendant-appellee after having been shown the real estate by the defendant and his agent. Allegations are made that the defendant and his agent represented the electrical wiring to be in excellent condition, the plumbing to consist of new copper piping, the furnace to be new and in excellent operating condition, and the basement not subject to being flooded. Further, plaintiff states that such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ruedy v. Toledo Factories Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashmus v. CoughlinOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Ashmus v. CoughlinOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Ashmus v. CoughlinOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. In the Matter of Guardianship of Guzay, Unpublished Decision (9-23-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API