Norcross v. Stuart
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Exceptions from the ruling, pro forma, of Rice, J., at Nisi Prius.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was drawn up by
Kent, J.
This action was instituted by the husband and wife, against the defendant as a common carrier of passengers, for injuries sustained by the wife alone. The only ground of damage'1 set forth in the declaration, is the alleged injuries to the person of the wife. The wife has died since the entry of the action. • The husband has been appointed administrator on her estate. A motion was filed, setting forth the fact of the death of the wife, and declaring, as the ground of the motion to dismiss the action, that it cannot be prosecuted by the husband…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crozier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dimmey v. Wheeling & E. G. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Fink v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Saltmarsh v. CandiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1871