Legal Opinion

Norcross v. Stuart

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions from the ruling, pro forma, of Rice, J., at Nisi Prius.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Kent, J.

This action was instituted by the husband and wife, against the defendant as a common carrier of passengers, for injuries sustained by the wife alone. The only ground of damage'1 set forth in the declaration, is the alleged injuries to the person of the wife. The wife has died since the entry of the action. • The husband has been appointed administrator on her estate. A motion was filed, setting forth the fact of the death of the wife, and declaring, as the ground of the motion to dismiss the action, that it cannot be prosecuted by the husband…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crozier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dimmey v. Wheeling & E. G. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Fink v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Saltmarsh v. CandiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API