Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Vanderpool Feed & Supply Co. v. Sloan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1982No. WD32888Published

1DissentPritchard, Judge

The majority opinion rests principally upon relator’s failure to supply this court with a transcript of the hearing held by respondent upon the motion of defendant for a protective order. Although relator may be held to be remiss in failing to attach to its petition a copy of any record made as required by Rule 97.03, this matter is of such great importance to the bench and the bar as one of first impression that this court should exercise its prerogative to order that transcript to be filed. This may be done under Rule 97.01, which provides that in all particulars not provided for by Rules…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Madison v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Vorthman v. Keith E. Myers EnterprisesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Orth v. BauerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Towe v. Sinclair Refining CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
  5. Adkins v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API