Legal Opinion

Pack v. Feuchtenberger

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 14, 1929PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing.

Tbe appellee instituted tbis proceeding of forcible •detainer against tbe appellants in tbe Boyd county court. Tbe latter were found guilty of tbe detainer in tbat court, and thereupon they traversed the finding and appealed to tbe Boyd circuit court. On tbe trial of tbe proceeding in tbat court before a jury, tbe court peremptorily instructed tbe jury to find tbe appellants guilty of tbe forcible detainer complained of, and after the jury bad done so entered a judgment in accordance with tbe verdict. From tbat judgment, tbis appeal is prosecuted.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toner's Admr. v. South Covington & C. Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stewart's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  3. J. W. Reccius & Bro. v. Columbia Finance & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  4. Reck & Riehl v. CaulfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Alexander v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shinkle v. TurnerKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. FultzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  3. Davidson v. KenneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Ferguson v. Housing Authority of MiddlesboroDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1980
  5. Sellers v. SpillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API