Legal Opinion

Extrom v. City of Tomahawk

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

Appellant contends that the city is without jurisdiction to levy a special assessment because the work had been done before any attempted assessment was made.

We are of the opinion that this question has been answered adversely to appellant in Bekkedal v. Viroqua (1924), 183 Wis. 176, 197, 198, 196 N. W. 879, 197 N. W. 707. In that case it was held the tax was invalid because the provisions of ch. 62, Stats., required that the grade of the street be established before work was commenced or assessments levied. The court there said:

“Upon the appeal from the special assessment the property owner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bekkedal v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dahlman v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Anger v. Al. G. Barnes Amusement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Filer & Stowell Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gergen v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dittberner v. Windsor Sanitary District Number 1Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API