Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Sumner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the Statute of Limitations contained in section 46 of the Civil Practice Act does not apply to this action. Assuming, as we must, that the allegations of the complaint are true, the defendant did not become, upon the delivery of the deed, a tenant by the entirety, nor upon her husband’s death, take the whole title in fee as survivor of such tenant. She had nothing but a hen upon the property to secure the indebtedness of $1,000 to her. That still remained her status upon her husband’s death. In other words, her right or interest in the property must be determined by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barson v. . MulliganNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Berkowitz v. BrownNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  3. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MbanefoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Lee v. BeagellNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Donohue v. First Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. Sumner v. SumnerNew York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API