Legal Opinion

Town of Shandaken v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sweeney, J. P.

Petitioner Town of Shandaken was ordered by the Supreme Court in 1977 to assess all real property within its borders at 100% of actual value. In assessing the extensive State forest lands within its borders, petitioner’s assessors arrived at a figure of $14,061,740 while respondent State *180Board of Equalization and Assessment (SBEA) maintained that the State land was worth only $10,863,370. In addition, a matter which was the subject of administrative review in early 1981 was whether respondent had applied the proper equalization rate to assessment roll…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Town of Arietta v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State Board of Equalization & Assessment v. KerwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State Board of Equalization & Assessment v. KerwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Town of Arieta v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  5. Town of Arietta v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Board of Education v. Board of Assessment Review of the FennerNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API