Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Glasgow

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 3, 1914PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. George H. Williams, Judge. (1) Whenever in pursuance of any law the property of an individual is to he divested against his will, there must be a strict compliance with all the provisions of law authorizing such a proceeding.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. George H. Williams, Judge. (1) Whenever in pursuance of any law the property of an individual is to he divested against his will, there must be a strict compliance with all the provisions of law authorizing such a proceeding. Lind v. Clemens, 44 Mo. 540; In re Bledsoe Hill, 200 Mo. 630; 3 Dillon on Municipal Corporations (5 Ed.), secs. 1040, 1041; 4 McQuillin on Municipal Corporations, secs. 1531, 1532; 2 Lewis on Eminent Domain, sec. 497. (2) Especially will the courts require a strict compliance with all conditions precedent to the exercise…

1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, P. J.

-The plaintiff, the city of St. Louis, a municipal corporation, organized and incorporated under the laws of this State, and operating under a special charter, instituted this suit in the circuit court of said city, against the defendants, to condemn some thirty-odd acres of land for the use of the waterworks of said city. Said land is particularly described, in the pleadings.

A trial was had which was not satisfactory to one of the defendants, and he duly appealed the cause to this court.

The facts are few and undisputed, except as to the value of the land taken and the extent of the damage…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ells v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. State ex rel. Kenamore v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Zimmerman v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Whitely v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Leslie v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Snyder Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Cranfill v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. United Cemeteries Co. v. StrotherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Bremerton Bridge Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API