Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mooney v. Tolles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentWheeler, C. J.

I am obliged to dissent from the opinion of the majority in its holding that the adopted daughter of Sheldon, the son of the. testatrix, is included among his “lawful children” and if he leave none to the “lawful issue” of her son King as provided in articles second and ninth of the will of the testatrix, and in its holding that the adopted daughter of Sheldon is included among the children of “my sons Sheldon and King” as provided in article third of her will. The determination of whether the adopted daughter was intended to be included by the testatrix among the “lawful children” or “the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. SearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  2. Ansonia National Bank v. KunkelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Hoadley v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Middletown Trust Co. v. GaffeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Baldwin v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodgers, Jr., Gdn. v. Miller, TrusteeOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API