Legal Opinion

Williams v. Connors

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 24, 1909No. Gen. No. 5,109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. N. E. Worthington, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

The sole question in this case is whether the court acquired jurisdiction of the person of the defendant in this action of assumpsit by a sufficient service of summons under the last sentence of section 2 of the Practice Act of 1907, which reads: “Service of summons, except when otherwise expressly provided by statute, shall be made by leaving a copy thereof with the defendant in person.” Omitting all reference to certain proceedings which were vacated at the same term, the record before us contains the following: a summons against Michael C. Connors, returnable on the second Monday of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sidway v. MarshallIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Kagay v. Trustees of SchoolsIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Wilday v. WightIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Great Northern Hotel Co. v. Farrand & Votey Organ Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Wilkinson v. OlinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dale v. KeefeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API