Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Regan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1870PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Indictment for rape. At the trial in the superior court, in Suffolk, before Putnam, J., Julia O’Shae, the woman upon whose person the act was committed, testified as a witness for the Commonwealth ; and was asked, in cross-examination, whether. she ever had sexual intercourse with any other man than the defendant, and whether, at a time specified in the question as the time when she lived with the Widow Wadman, she did not declare that she was pregnant and name two persons “…

Read the full summary

Indictment for rape. At the trial in the superior court, in Suffolk, before Putnam, J., Julia O’Shae, the woman upon whose person the act was committed, testified as a witness for the Commonwealth ; and was asked, in cross-examination, whether. she ever had sexual intercourse with any other man than the defendant, and whether, at a time specified in the question as the time when she lived with the Widow Wadman, she did not declare that she was pregnant and name two persons “ as having been instrumental ” in making her so. The defendant’s counsel stated that he proposed to show, by this…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The evidence offered as to particular acts, and the questions put to the witness, were inadmissible.

Hxeeptions overruled.

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. McKayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. ElderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API