Legal Opinion

Neys v. Taylor

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Moody county. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by Catherine Neys against I. O. Taylor for damages for malicious prosecution. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an action for damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. It appears from the evidence that in the summer and fall of 1895 the plaintiff resided with her husband upon a certain farm in Moody county, and that on or about the 15th of November they left the farm, leaving a small portion of their household effects in the dwelling, and took a restaurant, or hotel and restaurant, in the village of Egan. About the 2d day of January, the plaintiff, with her husband, concluded to return to the farm, not finding the business…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. DybedahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Vander Linden v. OsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API