Majestic Sun Owners' Ass'n v. Florida Condos I Ltd. Partnership
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We DENY the petition for writ of cer-tiorari on the merits to the extent that petitioner argues that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in dissolving a notice of lis pendens. We DISMISS the petition to the extent that petitioner argues that the trial court erred in denying its request to amend its complaint as to certain counts. See Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (holding that a petition for writ of certiorari should be dismissed if there has been an insufficient showing of irreparable harm and should be denied when it is determined…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Hawaiian Inn v. Snead Const. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Sciabbarrasi v. UddoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Venus Laboratories, Inc. v. KatzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. PeltDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Pool v. BungerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011