People v. Gibson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*1126A determination whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry into the apartment involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s power of review (see People v Brown, 95 NY2d 942 [2000]; People v Hallman, 92 NY2d 840 [1998]).
We agree with the Appellate Division that defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit or are unpreserved.
Chief Judge Lippman and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. HallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. CazeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.