Legal Opinion

People v. Gibson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 2015PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*1126A determination whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry into the apartment involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s power of review (see People v Brown, 95 NY2d 942 [2000]; People v Hallman, 92 NY2d 840 [1998]).

We agree with the Appellate Division that defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit or are unpreserved.

Chief Judge Lippman and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. HallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. CazeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API