Legal Opinion

Bagalini v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 8, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The main issue is whether unemployment compensation benefits were subject to a court-ordered assignment. We agree with the trial court that they were.

Mr. and Mrs. Bagalini were divorced in 1973. The decree provided that Mr. Bagalini pay appellee $150 per month as child support. By 1977, a judgment for arrearages of $4,175 was entered. The parties stipulated to Mr. Bagalini making an assignment of wages, pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-323, as to both the $150 per month and a $50 per month arrearage payment, so that a total of $200 per month would be paid by his employer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meadows v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Bickel v. BickelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Industrial Commission v. OdenArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Hanley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API