Bagalini v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
The main issue is whether unemployment compensation benefits were subject to a court-ordered assignment. We agree with the trial court that they were.
Mr. and Mrs. Bagalini were divorced in 1973. The decree provided that Mr. Bagalini pay appellee $150 per month as child support. By 1977, a judgment for arrearages of $4,175 was entered. The parties stipulated to Mr. Bagalini making an assignment of wages, pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-323, as to both the $150 per month and a $50 per month arrearage payment, so that a total of $200 per month would be paid by his employer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meadows v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Bickel v. BickelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Industrial Commission v. OdenArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Hanley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001