Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 1999No. 98-2853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Clarification Granted

2Per curiam

The opinion of this Court filed on October 13, 1999, is vacated and this opinion is substituted in its stead.

Defendant Curtis Scott appeals the trial court’s order denying his “Writ of Habeas Corpus or in the alternative. a 3.850 or 3.800(a) Motion for Post-Conviction Relief.” We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for the corrections outlined herein.

Two of the points raised by the defendant are of merit. First, defendant is correct in his contention that the trial court erred by imposing a twelve year general sentence for counts I, II and III. See…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Burgess v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brazley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. TAMBASCO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API