Legal Opinion

Pensee Associates Ltd. v. Quon Shis-Shong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered July 22, 1993, which granted the motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) *74by the Wolfberg defendants to amend their verified answer to withdraw all admissions of agency, and order of the same court and Justice, also entered on July 22, 1993, which granted plaintiff’s motion for reargument only to the extent of declaring a mistrial, and otherwise adhered to the court’s prior determination, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

It is axiomatic that leave to amend pleadings should be freely given (CPLR 3025 [b]), that the determination of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lanpont v. Savvas Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Drayton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Poveromo v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Ness Tech. SARL v. Pactera Tech. Intl. Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API