Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clow v. Metropolitan Sanitary District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1983No. 82—3060Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE LINN,

dissenting:

On petition for rehearing, Justice Linn would allow the petition and dissents from the majority opinion for the following reasons:

The purpose of the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 48, pars. 60 through 69) is to prevent injuries to (Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank (1972), 7 Ill. App. 3d 991, 996, 289 N.E.2d 90, 94, affirmed (1973), 55 Ill. 2d 121, 302 N.E.2d 64) and protect (Wright v. Synergistics, Inc. (1977), 52 Ill. App. 3d 233, 235, 367 N.E.2d 466, 467) workers engaged in dangerous and extrahazardous occupations (Crafton v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Crafton v. Lester B. Knight & Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Burke v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Urman v. WalterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Zizzo v. Ben Pekin Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API