Legal Opinion

Howell v. City of Birmingham

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1980PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an obscenity case involving the exhibition of a movie entitled "Honeypie" in violation of Birmingham City Ordinance 16-18 as amended.

The defendant was employed as a clerk and movie projectionist at the Tomkat Theatre in Jefferson County. He was tried and convicted in Municipal Court. He appealed to the Circuit Court, was tried by a jury and fined five hundred dollars. The trial judge imposed a sentence of 180 days hard labor.

I

In Holderfield v. City of Birmingham, Ala.Cr.App.,380 So.2d 990, (1979), this Court held that a jury trial is not constitutionally required for an obscenity…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grandquest v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  2. Mahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  3. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Qualls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Oglen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API