Legal Opinion

H. J. McGrath Co. v. Mobley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1949No. 32251PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

A plea of non est factum positively denying the execution of an instrument sued on casts the burden of proving the execution upon the plaintiff. Martin v. Lamb, 77 Ga. 252 (3 S. E. 10); Jewell v. Walker, 109 Ga. 241 (34 S. E. 337); Hall v. Enfaula Brick Co., 50 Ga. App. 466 (178 S. E. 403); Bank of Norwood v. Chapman, 19 Ga. App. 709 (6) (92 S. E. 225). But, in answer to a plea of non est factum, it is only necessary for the plaintiff to make out a prima facie case of the execution of the instrument sued on in order to authorize its admission in evidence (Jewell v. Walker, supra; Farmers &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Lamb & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Bank of Norwood v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Jewell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Stovall Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Emory v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Gas Corp. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API