Moore v. Olin
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Calhoun Circuit in Chancery.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice;
This Court has no jurisdiction over the subject of this motion. The statute (§3597, Comp. L.) requires the party claiming an appeal in chancery to execute a bond conditioned to perform the decree of this Cdurt, &c. The penalty of *329this bond is to be fixed, and the sureties approved, by a judge or circuit court commissioner. The power vested in these officers is exclusive; and to entertain this motion, or any other of a kindred nature, would be, in reality, the exercise of an appellate jurisdiction not vested in the Court. If the bond were solely to secure the payment of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People ex rel. Horn v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Belknap v. Township of BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Richardson v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Tinley v. FrederickSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940
- Wall v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1925