Legal Opinion

Moore v. Olin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun Circuit in Chancery.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice;

This Court has no jurisdiction over the subject of this motion. The statute (§3597, Comp. L.) requires the party claiming an appeal in chancery to execute a bond conditioned to perform the decree of this Cdurt, &c. The penalty of *329this bond is to be fixed, and the sureties approved, by a judge or circuit court commissioner. The power vested in these officers is exclusive; and to entertain this motion, or any other of a kindred nature, would be, in reality, the exercise of an appellate jurisdiction not vested in the Court. If the bond were solely to secure the payment of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Horn v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Belknap v. Township of BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Richardson v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Tinley v. FrederickSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940
  5. Wall v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API