Legal Opinion
Harwood Pharmacal Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1961PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Desmond.
In this libel suit defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency was denied below but the Appellate Division granted defendants leave to appeal here, probably because of our decision in Drug Research Corp. v. Curtis Pub. Co. (7 A D 2d 285, revd. 7 N Y 2d 435).
Plaintiff is the manufacturer of a pharmaceutical product known as ‘ ‘ Snooze ’ ’" and all the defendants, it is alleged, had to do in one way or another with the production and exhibition ' on December 26, 1957 of a television program. During the telecast, so the complaint alleges, one of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- O'Connell v. . Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Tobias v. HarlandNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- First National Bank v. WintersNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Walter Jacobson and Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Daniel Fetler v. Houghton Mifflin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Angio-Medical Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Penthouse International, Ltd. v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.