Legal Opinion

Houck v. Carigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1960No. Docket 88, Calendar 47,836PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff-appellant submits 1 question, namely:

“Did tbe trial court err in holding defendant free of negligence as a matter of law and in directing a verdict of no cause for action!”

Plaintiff, a 9-year-old girl, was injured by coming in contact with defendant’s car. The impact was on the side of the car in front of the right hand door.

Plaintiff was crossing Genesee avenue, in the .city of Saginaw, 175 feet north of the intersection of Genesee and Holland street. She was not crossing on a crosswalk and was proceeding from west to east.

Genesee avenue at this point is a 5-lane highway, each lane…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gamet v. JenksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Johnson v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Estate of Cornell Fuller v. Carl Douglas Tramel JrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Estate of Earl King v. Christopher SawyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API