Legal Opinion

Wineblad v. Department of Registration & Education

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1987No. 85-123PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiffs, Raymond W. Wineblad and Thomas J. Jones, filed an action for declaratory and injunctive relief against defendant, the Department of Registration and Education (the Department), alleging that an amendment to the statutory licensing requirements for physician’s assistants enacted after plaintiffs had become licensed in 1977 was unconstitutional. The amended statute required plaintiffs to take an additional certifying examination as a condition of retaining their licenses as physician’s assistants. The Department’s motion for summary judgment was granted and plaintiffs appeal from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Rios v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Panchinsin v. Enterprise CompaniesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Gonzales-Blanco v. ClaytonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Harrington v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Potts v. Illinois Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Consiglio v. Department of Financial & Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Valdez v. ZollarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Bhalerao v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional RegulationsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. Yap v. ZollarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API