Nagle v. Isbrandtsen Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The appeal raises three points: (1) the refusal of the judge to dismiss the action for lack of evidence; (2) his refusal to grant six requests to charge; (3) his refusal to reduce the verdict. We may dispose of the third at once without discussion; it was of course a matter wholly within the judge’s discretion. The first point was equally devoid of merit: it was in two parts. The first part was that the plaintiff was not injured on the ship at all, and that.was palpably a question for the jury. The second part was that the port passageway was clean, and the plaintiff should have chosen to use…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Stevenson v. Hearst Consol. Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Katherine Comiskey v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Chester Naquin, G & M Boats, Inc. v. Tidelands Marine Service, Inc., and Plaisance Dragline & Dredging Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Kennair v. Mississippi Shipping Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952