Legal Opinion

Nagle v. Isbrandtsen Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 19, 1949No. 34, Docket 21399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal raises three points: (1) the refusal of the judge to dismiss the action for lack of evidence; (2) his refusal to grant six requests to charge; (3) his refusal to reduce the verdict. We may dispose of the third at once without discussion; it was of course a matter wholly within the judge’s discretion. The first point was equally devoid of merit: it was in two parts. The first part was that the plaintiff was not injured on the ship at all, and that.was palpably a question for the jury. The second part was that the port passageway was clean, and the plaintiff should have chosen to use…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Stevenson v. Hearst Consol. Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Katherine Comiskey v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Chester Naquin, G & M Boats, Inc. v. Tidelands Marine Service, Inc., and Plaisance Dragline & Dredging Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Kennair v. Mississippi Shipping Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API