Legal Opinion

Salsman v. NAT. COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 19, 1969PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

105 N.J. Super. 164 (1969)

251 A.2d 460

ELIZABETH A. SALSMAN (FORMERLY ELIZABETH A. ODGERS), INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR J. ODGERS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD, A BANKING CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,

v.

HAROLD BRESLOW AND THE FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 10, 1969.

Decided March 19, 1969.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.

Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for appellant (Messrs.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salsman v. National Community Bank of RutherfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Salsman v. National Community BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tobey v. TobeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  2. Sommers v. McKinneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Leeds v. Chase Manhattan BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Taylor v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API