Legal Opinion

Klestinec v. Thruway Terminals, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Special Term correctly ruled that the contract of indemnification under which Thruway agreed to indemnify Norfolk is limited to Thruway’s own negligence. The operative language is in paragraph 9 (b) which, insofar as relevant, covers indemnification for claims from injury to any person caused directly or indirectly by the acts or omissions of the contractor (Thruway), its agents, servants or employees. This must be read with the contrasting language of paragraph 9 (a), which covers indemnification for claims from injury to Thruway agents, servants or employees, and explicitly…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delaware Otsego Corp. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Time Associates v. Blake Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re the Estate of SherezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API