Brown v. Father Divine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
We believe that facts sufficient to sustain the cause of action in equity are to be found in this record. In addition to the reasons assigned by the trial justice, it should be noted that the defendant failed to set forth facts in his answer showing that an adequate remedy at law existed. In Baron v. Korn (127 N. Y. 224) Judge Parker said in part: “If the question whether the plaintiff ought to have been required to establish his title in an action at law were properly reviewable here, it need not be considered, because the defendant did not, by his answer, object that the plaintiffs had an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bloomquist v. . FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Baron v. . KornNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maffei v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Brown v. Father DivineNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- In re the Arbitration between BlockNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Love v. Love (In Re Love)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995