Legal Opinion

Horst v. City of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 18, 1937No. 14,130PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial conrt and are hereinafter refered to as plaintiff and the city respectively.

The city’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint was sustained, she elected to stand, and to review the judgment of dismissal thereupon entered against her she prosecutes this writ. The principal question before us is, Should prior notice of the claim have been served and pleaded?

Prom the complaint it appears that the city maintains a baseball park within its corporate limits, across the street from which plaintiff resided. One afternoon, while a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dahlin v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Peek v. City of LamarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Lee v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Lipira v. City of ThorntonColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Zelinger v. Public Service Company of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Wilson v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API