Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 1990No. 88-02314Published

1Per curiam

Appellant Edith Smith brings two separate errors to our attention. First, her two convictions and sentences for possession of marijuana must be vacated. In each instance it is undisputed that these involved the same undivided quantity of marijuana as did the two sale charges. Gordon v. State, 528 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Dukes v. State, 528 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Second, court costs were assessed without prior notice, thus requiring us to strike this provision of the judgment and sentence. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989).

The judgments and sentences for sale of marijuana…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Gordon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Dukes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API