People v. Henderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCatterson, J.
Because I believe the People’s unfounded comments and insinuations about the intimidation of the victim substantially prejudiced the defendant, I would reverse and remand for a new trial. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.
This is a case where the People ignored the victim’s testimony that the defendant was not his assailant, and suggested, without any evidentiary basis, that the victim was lying because he had been intimidated by the defendant. When the victim denied any intimidation, the People then argued that the victim’s denials meant that he had, in fact, been intimidated. The victim’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. CalabriaNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. AliceaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. NortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.